Should Human History Be Rewritten Based Upon New Discoveries? – Ben Van Kirkwyk With Jerm Warfare

Watch every show here.

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today – $1 Trial

Ben Van Kerkwyk is a researcher and creator of UnchartedX, a website and YouTube channel looking into ancient mysteries, presenting new ideas about humanity’s past.

He has been traveling the world for decades, filming ancient sites and interviewing leading historians, which has taken him on a journey of suspicion surrounding established history. (The establishment must always be viewed with a skeptical eye. Just like “trusting the science” is a bad move, so is “trusting the history.”)

I believe there is a need for high quality content that addresses the new science and new discoveries that should affect how we view the past, and to examine the contradictions that are clearly evident on ancient sites, and in our orthodox version of history.

Ben Van Kirkwyk

For example, I’ve often thought that the official story of the Egyptian pyramids doesn’t make sense. And what about Easter Island? How and why were such gigantic heads (and bodies) constructed on an island in the middle of nowhere?

How and why were they built?

Join Our Community Of Patriots

Or what about all the other many mysterious structures around the world, for which no reasonable explanation exists?

• Göbekli Tepe, which is apparently the oldest place of worship, built before humans settled or figured out agriculture.
• Goseck Circle, which is a really big clock in Germany, predating the Egyptian pyramids and has some pretty advanced science included.
• Ggantija, like the Egyptian pyramids, is an engineering mystery. The conventional narrative – that it was built by primitive people – is laughable.

The list is endless.

Teotihuacan, in Mexico, is super old and super advanced.

Assuming that human history is linear is simply ridiculous.

In other words, believing that humans were primitive (thousands of years ago) and became advanced (today), and that’s the end of it, doesn’t match up to observable reality.

As Ben points out, what is more plausible is the idea that, thousands of years ago, humans were indeed advanced (which is demonstrably true) and that some sort of cataclysmic event wiped them out, ending a cycle of technological development and forcing the start of a new one. And the interesting part is that new evidence increasingly supports the idea that human history is much older than we might think and that it is cyclical.

Take a listen to our conversation. It’s both fascinating and eye-opening.

Learn How To Protect Your Life Savings From Inflation and An Irresponsible Government, With Gold and Silver

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.